Operations & Sourcing method guide

Force Field Analysis

Examine forces supporting and resisting a change, then plan actions to strengthen support or reduce barriers.

Beginner-friendly guide · 4 min read

What Force Field Analysis does

Examine forces supporting and resisting a change, then plan actions to strengthen support or reduce barriers.

A project can have strong technical benefits and still fail to gain traction. This analysis puts the forces supporting change beside those holding it back.

InnovationFlow records the direction, strength, evidence and proposed action for each force. Use the picture to choose practical interventions rather than to declare a winning side.

Force field analysis is associated with Kurt Lewin. ASQ describes its use for comparing driving and restraining forces. InnovationFlow records evidence and follow-up actions alongside the assessment.[1]

Method schematicUnderstand what moves the change forward

Illustrative forces for a factory retrofit.

  1. 1Reliability need
  2. 2Operator support
  3. 3Proposed change
  4. 4Shutdown constraint
  5. 5Training capacity

Original InnovationFlow illustration. Example values and software behaviour are explained in this guide; method sources are listed below.

Understand the method

The parts in plain language

1

Driving force

Something that helps the specified change happen.

Illustrative example

Repeated unplanned stops make reliability improvement a priority.

2

Restraining force

Something that limits or obstructs the change.

Illustrative example

The line has no spare shutdown window for installation.

3

Intervention

An action that addresses a particular force.

Illustrative example

Test the retrofit during an already planned maintenance stop.

When to use it

  • When a technically sound initiative is difficult to implement.
  • When the team needs to understand practical barriers and sources of support.

A practical workflow

  1. 1

    State the specific change being considered.

  2. 2

    Identify driving and restraining forces.

  3. 3

    Assess strength from 1 to 5 and record supporting evidence.

  4. 4

    Assign actions, owners and review dates for the forces the team can influence.

Fictional worked example

Introducing a new maintenance system

This example is illustrative rather than a reported case. A fictional factory has a credible design but limited implementation time.

Support

Observation:Operators want fewer breakdowns.

Implication:Include their experience in the trial design.

Barrier

Observation:Training capacity is limited.

Implication:Plan training before the proposed rollout.

Action

Observation:Run a trial on one line.

Implication:Check whether the intervention reduces the barrier.

From analysis to decision

How to interpret the result

  • 1Discuss evidence before assigning strength.
  • 2Review the forces as circumstances change.

Practical interpretation guidance from InnovationFlow. Refer to the method sources below for the underlying approach.

What a useful output looks like

A balanced view of support and resistance.
An action plan for the barriers and enablers that matter.

Common pitfalls

  • The balance of ordinal scores is not a probability of success.
  • A restraining force may reflect a legitimate constraint rather than reluctance to change.

References and method basis

  1. [1]American Society for Quality (n.d.). Force Field Analysis. ASQ Quality Resources. Source ↗Originating institution

This guide synthesises the named sources into practical questions for strategy and innovation work. It does not claim that using a tool by itself produces a successful decision.

Practitioner support

Talk to an experienced practitioner

Ask about roadmapping, facilitation or applying a method in your organisation. Your question goes directly to the InnovationFlow team.

Sent securely to hello@innovationflow.app.

We use your details to answer your question and keep any campaign labels with the request. Privacy information